Trump’s Case Takes HUGE Turn – Judge Could Be Removed After New Discovery

OPINION:  This article contains commentary which may reflect the author’s opinion

Former President Donald Trump has made a request for Judge Tanya Chutkan to disqualify herself from the legal proceedings pertaining to the 2020 election subversion case in which he is the defendant. This case has been initiated by special counsel Jack Smith.

In a recent court filing on Monday, Trump referenced statements made by Chutkan in cases pertaining to the individuals involved in the January 6 US Capitol violence. He posited that there exists a high probability that rational individuals within society may “believe she has prejudged both the facts pertinent to this case and President Trump’s alleged culpability.”
Judge Chutkan asserts that the constitutional guarantee of free speech, as it pertains to former President Trump in the January 6 case, is not without limitations.

“In a highly charged political season, naturally all Americans, and in fact, the entire world, are observing these proceedings closely,” he declared. “Only if this trial is administered by a judge who appears entirely impartial could the public ever accept the outcome as justice.”

Chutkan has requested the perspective of the prosecutors from the Justice Department, which is expected to be submitted in a file by Thursday. Subsequently, Trump will be afforded the option to respond to the aforementioned reasons through a submission to be made by Sunday.

Chutkan, an individual appointed by Barack Obama and then assigned to Trump’s case through a random process, has consistently expressed her views regarding the riot at the Capitol. She has characterized the violence as an attack on the democratic principles of the United States and has raised concerns about the potential for future political violence. The judge has consistently imposed prison sentences on convicted rioters that surpass the recommendations made by the prosecutors.

Chutkan has also overseen civil litigation pertaining to the events of January 6, 2021, which included a firm denial of former President Trump’s efforts to stop the House select committee’s viewing of over 700 pages of documents during his tenure .

In the aforementioned judgment, Chutkan stated that “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.”

It is probable that Trump’s plea for Chutkan to recuse herself from presiding over his criminal case will face significant challenges, given that the request was submitted directly to Chutkan.

The initial instance emphasized by the Trump team is derived from a sentencing proceeding in October 2022, during which Chutkan asserted that “the people who mobbed that Capitol were there in fealty, in loyalty, to one man – not to the Constitution. … It’s a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.”

Clearly, Chutkan plans on jailing Trump.

During a sentencing hearing in December 2021, Chutkan informed another defendant involved in the Capitol riot “the people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged.”

The Democrat judge continued, “The issue of who has or has not been charged is not before me. I don’t have any influence on that. I have my opinions, but they are not relevant.”

Trump has entered a plea of not guilty in response to all accusations brought against him.

President Trump has already employed this particular technique.

In a complex and speculative civil lawsuit initiated by Trump in Florida against former Justice Department officials, Hillary Clinton, and other Democratic figures, Trump claimed a RICO conspiracy in relation to the 2016 election. Trump requested the withdrawal of the judge who was handling the case due to the judge’s appointment by President Bill Clinton. The motion was initially dismissed by US District Judge Donald Middlebrooks last year; but, President Trump has subsequently renewed it.

Trump has also previously endeavored to have the judge presiding over the criminal case in New York, which pertains to the hush money transactions, disqualified.

Trump contended that Judge Juan Merchan ought to disqualify himself on account of his daughter’s involvement in political advising, including her engagement with the Biden campaign in 2020 and her subsequent involvement with the campaign of now-Vice President Kamala Harris. The request was declined by Merchan in August.

Last Wednesday, President Donald Trump, expressed his intention to remain a candidate in the 2024 election, despite four indictments over him, indicating his unwillingness to withdraw from the campaign.

Former President Trump is currently confronted with two indictments, one from Special Counsel Jack Smith, another from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and a third from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. A number of Republicans has perceived these legal actions as politically motivated assaults on the former president.

During an interview with radio program host Hugh Hewitt, President Trump was queried about his willingness to temporarily halt his reelection campaign in the event that all three prosecutors extended an offer to dismiss the charges against him.

Hewitt inquired of the former president: “If Jack Smith and Fani Willis and Alvin Bragg all get together and they come see you at Bedminster or Mar-A-Lago and they say to you, ‘We will drop everything, it will all go away if you withdraw from the race and politics.’ Will you take that deal?”

Trump responded definitely, saying, “I have no interest. You know me well enough. No interest. Absolutely no interest. I think they’d make that deal right now. That’s what it’s all about — this is interfering with an election. And all those fools that write, that ‘oh, they really want Trump to win,’ they changed it, actually. So now, they say they did it in order to keep me strong. They thought this was going to take me down, this was not going to keep me strong.”

COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 

 

 

 

 

Send this to a friend