The ‘Pedo Island’ guest list is not in the dustbin of history yet, as legal minds predict that the list may actually hit the sunlight after all- considering that the information of who exploited the crime scene may be a ‘get out of jail-free card’ for the notorious madame who took the young girls to their abusers.
Attorney Spencer Kuvin, who represented nine of Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers, recently put former President Bill Clinton and other associates of Epstein’s on notice that they were still in danger of being exposed for their alleged criminal actions dealing with the deceased convicted sex trafficker, Epstein.
“Bill Clinton should be sweating bullets,” one reporter wrote about the potential client list.
It has long been suspected by court watchers that a notorious list of clientele for Epstein, allegedly including Clinton, would eventually emerge, and they may be righ, according to investigators and lawyers who have followed the complex case.
The shocking warning came out of a new documentary that investigated the role of Britain’s Prince Andrew and his close ties as a client of Epstein’s, when the comments were made that there could be further revelations about other clients of Epstein’s because his madame- Ghislaine Maxwell – who was recently convicted for crimes associated with Epstein has until June 2023 to cooperate with prosecutors, in possibly overturning more names.
Maxwell, 60, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in June. She will most likely die in prison unless she makes a deal.
Kuvin told the documentarians that Maxwell intended to appeal her conviction and that she has the opportunity to cooperate with federal authorities and to try to reduce her lengthy sentence.
Maxwell, 60, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in June. She will most likely die in prison unless she makes a deal. Bill Clinton should be sweating bullets.
Maxwell is living in FCI Tallahassee, a low-security federal prison in Florida, where she has reportedly ganged up with an infamous double murderer, there according to media reports.
“She is really the person who holds all the secrets,” said Kuvin says in the documentary ‘Prince Andrew: Banished. This isn’t the end of the story.”
He isn’t alone.
Matthew Galluzzo is a New York City federal criminal defense attorney and former sex crimes prosecutor in Manhattan who has written about his interest in the case.
From the offices of Matthew J. Galluzzo :
Following her conviction at trial in the Southern District of New York for various federal charges relating to the sex trafficking of minors, disgraced Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell received a sentence of 20 years in prison. She will get credit towards that sentence for the time she has already spent in prison, and assuming she receives the maximum amount of good time credit for her behavior in custody, she will probably only serve about 85% of that sentence or 17 years.
The question on everyone’s mind has been whether Ms. Maxwell will finally disclose the names of the other purportedly rich and powerful celebrities who engaged in illicit conduct with minors and Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Maxwell has steadfastly refused to do that, even after Epstein’s death (to the surprise of some). Ms. Maxwell initially denied being knowingly involved in any criminal conduct, and her statement at sentencing was hardly an apology, either.
Ms. Maxwell may also have a legitimate ground for an appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. After the verdict, a juror disclosed that they had not told the Court during jury selection about having been a victim of a sexual assault. Judge Nathan (the trial judge) denied a motion for a new trial on that basis, and Maxwell will almost certainly pursue that argument on appeal.
The question now is whether Ms. Maxwell will consider disclosing the names of the Epstein “clients” pursuant to Federal Rule 35. That rule makes it possible for a convicted defendant to have their sentence reduced for providing “substantial assistance” to law enforcement following the imposition of sentence:
(b) Reducing a Sentence for Substantial Assistance.
(1) In General. Upon the government’s motion made within one year of sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant, after sentencing, provided substantial assistance in investigating or prosecuting another person.
(2) Later Motion. Upon the government’s motion made more than one year after sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant’s substantial assistance involved:
(A) information not known to the defendant until one year or more after sentencing;
(B) information provided by the defendant to the government within one year of sentencing, but which did not become useful to the government until more than one year after sentencing; or
(C) information the usefulness of which could not reasonably have been anticipated by the defendant until more than one year after sentencing and which was promptly provided to the government after its usefulness was reasonably apparent to the defendant.
As you can see, Ms. Maxwell will need to disclose this information within a year, or it will be too late for her to benefit. She theoretically might try to appeal her sentence before making that decision to cooperate, but her appeal might take longer than a year to resolve. Clearly, though, were she to divulge important information about “the clients” to federal prosecutors, she might be able to reduce her sentence such that she does not risk dying in prison.