OPINION: This article contains commentary which may reflect the author's opinion
Hillary R. Clinton may be about to go down in American History books as the most divisive, power-grabbing, and nasty politician- and that says a lot because we have seen some real monsters in our lifetimes.
Clinton, who has held and abused power for decades, is not a popular woman outside of the nation’s capital, where people view her as a means to power. Moreover, it is questionable if her own supporters even really like her.
There is little evidence that she could have won a position as President of the United States of America, so Clinton had to attempt to get back into the White House as POTUS with a series of fraudulent acts upon the American people- when she ran against historically popular Donald J. Trump in 2016.
She needed not only friendly PR-style press; Clinton needed a pitbull attack dog and a debased liar – and a submissive media industry.
According to some independent media reports, the proof that she had all of that is about to come out. It happens just as the Biden administration pushes its new ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ to control social media.
It is important to know that Clinton has a top-notch ‘whistleblower,’ an FBI former intelligence chief telling that story, who is saying he is now convinced Democrat Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign used “contrived disinformation” to try to mislead Americans into believing Donald Trump was a Russian asset.
Clinton has a long pattern of deceitful behavior and a mastery at deception since before her time as Arkansas First Lady, with powerful skills in hiding her long usurpations, but that may all be coming to an end in 2022, according to long-time political watchers and now- the former Intel officer.
Just the News reported on Friday, “Ex-FBI intel chief said that the Clinton campaign used ‘contrived disinformation’ to deceive voters in 2016.”
“This is more than just political dirty tricks,” says Kevin Brock. “Political dirty tricks usually have some foundation in truth, but they just made stuff up.”
The use of liberal-friendly media has been known by the public since at least 1996 with the book by Bernard Goldberg, Biased.
Goldberg’s book overview says: “In 1996, veteran CBS News reporter and producer Bernie Goldberg committed the unpardonable sin of publicly mentioning the issue of liberal bias in the media. For that, he became persona non grata at CBS. Goldberg tells how friends and colleagues turned on him, from junior CBS reporters all the way to Dan Rather. But much more than that, he exposes a bias. Hence, uniform and overwhelming that it permeates every news story we hear and read- and so entrenched and deep-rooted that the networks themselves don’t even recognize it.”
Even though Americans knew about the bias, few people understood the purpose of the bias as political tactics to help liberals get into office and hold on to power.
Clinton has used those tactics and, according to the JTN report, has taken ‘biased liberal news’ and weaponized the industry against the American people and the integrity of government, media, and elections.
John Durham has been investigating the origins of the Russiagate hoax, and Clinton’s fingerprints are being exposed.
An update from Durham’s findings, Thursday night, was reported that jurors in the trial of ex-Clinton attorney Michael Sussmann need to know about the campaign’s connection to the Steele dossier. And the Steel dossier leads to bad news for Hillary.
America all saw the slow drip of fake news about the Steele dossier play out for four years aimed at Trump and his associates, which was nothing more than a crazy story- pushed out by biased media groups- dressed up as news.
Brock, one of the bureau’s most respected former executives, said he had been impressed with the way Special Counsel John Durham has used the prosecution of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann to expose how the false Russia collusion narrative was constructed.
Sussmann, who has pleaded innocent and faces trial at the end of the month, is charged with lying to the FBI in fall 2016 when he denied he was acting on behalf of a client in bringing the bureau what turned out to be false allegations that Trump had a secret communications channel with the Kremlin.
Durham has exposed recent evidence showing the Clinton campaign’s own researchers were skeptical of the allegation, which one described as a “red herring.” The underlying data permitted no more than an “inference” at best, according to another. Last week, prosecutors unveiled an email showing a journalist had told the campaign research team weeks before it approached the FBI that one of the Trump-Russia allegations was “bullshit.”
“This is the way disinformation is really exposed, not by some contrived government agency, but by evidence presented in court that gets at the truth of what happened,” Brock said of the prosecutor’s recent evidentiary filings in court. “What Durham is methodically doing, is laying out a case that the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democrat Party used contrived disinformation in a conspiracy, in a conspiratorial way, to deceive the American voter ahead of the election.”