BREAKING: Clinton Foundation Auditor Sanctioned – $438 Million ‘error’

OPINION:  This article contains commentary which may reflect the author’s opinion

Democrats aviod public transparency in their non-profits all of the time, but in Arkansas, home of the Clinton Foundation one man is pushing back by filing a landmark lawsuit again an audit group who has not done their job- and appears to have acted corruptly to give the group cover for fraud.

A report by Bob Bishop, a forensic investigator and a 30-year CPA veteran, appeared in The Gateway Pundit (TGP), exposing massive fraud and corruption with The Clinton Foundation, which is led by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

But it gets even worse than Clinton’s corruption. Now there appears to be corruption on the part of law enforcement, the intelligence community, and the auditors too.

Bishop provided great details for  TGP, including legal documents and told his story:

“The Clinton Foundation is America’s largest unprosecuted racketeering and charity fraud case. Investigations of the Clinton Foundation, shelved by the corrupt and partisan DOJ, FBI, and IRS leadership, demonstrate a two-tier justice system with exemptions for the political elite.

After 13 years, where audits had been exhausted by other groups, Bishop reported there was one “remaining pathway for due process was petitioning the Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy to enforce AICPA professional standards.”

“By dismissing AICPA professional standards and IRS compliance, the firm created a veneer of legitimacy for the Clinton Foundation,” Bishop reported, adding:

“I filed a complaint with the Arkansas Board against BKD, LLP. The complaint (59 allegations), relying on public documents, charged BKD with professional misconduct and failure to comply with the following AICPA standards and the IRS Code.”

Bishop reported that his complaint covered substantial irregularities and documented a culture of deceit and offered some abstracts on his thoughts.

Trustee Oversight & Control Failures

The Foundation’s Board of Trustees engaged Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP, to review its “decadal” (Or is it decadent?) governance. Their report was issued in late December 2011. WikiLeaks released the draft document widely covered in media outlets. The governance review found severe organizational and internal control weaknesses jeopardizing the Foundation’s tax-exempt status. Why did BKD ignore the flashing warning signals?

Material Errors and Omissions in 990 Tax Returns

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential run caused the Foundation to evaluate, amend, and refile its tax filings for 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 on November 16, 2015. The justification was to disclose foreign government grants and the Clintons’ paid speeches on behalf of the Foundation because the few lines on the returns were previously left blank. Foundation President Dr. Donna Shalala issued a logic-defying press release that the Foundation exceeded all legal tax requirements and “that the errors did not require us to amend our returns.” The accounting fees for 2015 were a staggering $2.7 million suggesting otherwise.

I compared the original returns line-by-line to the amended returns. The reconciliations found extensive and material revisions of over 200 items each year. Substantial changes occurred in the reporting categories in the Balance Sheet, Statement of Functional Expenses, and Revenue Statement. These changes required the Foundation to reissue the consolidated financial statements or compulsory for BKD to rescind its audit opinions; however, neither happened. The Foundation routinely restated its financial statements; for instance, the reissuance of 2010 due to offsetting marginal errors of just 2.2% of revenue and expense.

Details at The Gateway Pundit include:

The Foundation’s Management Representation Letter included a disclosure that BKD prepared the financial statements. BDK violated independence, integrity, and objectivity ethical standards by compiling and auditing the Foundation’s financial statements.

Massive Accounting Errors

The Foundation’s agreement with the World Health Organization’s Unitaid was to purchase reduced-priced medicines as an agent. The Foundation’s Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) subsidiary negotiated for reduced-priced drugs with Unitaid advancing funds to CHAI to pay for the purchases shipped overseas by pharmaceutical companies.

Accounting principles required the funds to be held in an escrow account; however, CHAI booked the Unitaid advances as charity revenue and payments as program expenses. CHAI replaced BKD in 2012 with Meyers Hoffman McCann P.C.. Meyers firm corrected the flagrant accounting error for 2011 by restating CHAI’s financial statements and tax return. BKD ignored the restatement when it compiled and audited the 2011 and 2012 consolidated financial statements.

The accounting error from 2006 through 2011 totaled a whopping $483 million overstatement of revenue and expense. The Foundation and BKD never disclosed the monumental blunder, which grossly overstated its consolidated charitable activities and possibly concealed the diversion of funds.

Gross Overstatement of Library’s Construction Cost

The reported historical construction cost of the Clinton Library is $171.3 million or $1,332 per gross square foot. The Library cost is scandalously high when compared to equivalent high-quality Little Rock commercial buildings. The Heifer International and Arkansas Study Institute construction cost per gross square foot is $198 and $238, respectively, a flashing warning sign of possible construction fraud.

Failure to Audit Clinton Global Initiative

The Clintons have resurrected the disreputable Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) six-year hiatus. Last week it held an annual conference in New York City coinciding with the UN General Assembly. Vampires require a host.

According to the 1023 Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3), BKD advised CGI “in complying with relevant laws, regulations, and standards.” It failed to audit the pay-for-play subsidiary that made up over 20% of the consolidated revenue. Numerous states, including Arkansas, required CGI to be audited.

Failed the IRS Dual Test for Tax-Exemption

The Dual Test requires that a nonprofit be organized and operated according to its charter. The Foundation was organized exclusively as a Presidential Library, but exploded into numerous unrelated activities, including operating in foreign countries, deviating from its Articles of Incorporation purpose. The Foundation failed the Dual Test as a tax-exempt organization that would make it subject to Federal and state taxation.

Arkansas Consent Order

BKD signed the Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy Consent Order acknowledging that it failed to “exercise due professional care in the performance of professional services,” and that a licensee who performs auditing, review, compilation, management consulting, tax or other professional services shall comply with professional standards as defined in Board Rule 8.2.”

BKD also acknowledged it was first licensed with Arkansas in 2003, meaning it operated unlawfully for more than two years while providing services to the Clinton Foundation.

Kudos to the Arkansas Accountancy State Board for pursuing and disciplining BKD, but the firm’s acknowledgment without severe penalties is insufficient. Ethically, BKD should have pulled its audit opinions.

Lack of IRS Nonprofit Oversight

The probability of a nonprofit being audited by the IRS is .1%. The trivial audit rate is due to the lack of IRS resources to enforce the nonprofit tax code, creating a haven for fraud and graft. It places an extraordinary burden on the CPA profession to ensure client tax code compliance and protect the public’s interest.

CPA Profession Needs Adequate Funds and Regulatory Overhaul

State accounting boards’ limited staff and budgets (typically around one to three million dollars annually) are hamstrung to discipline national and global accounting firms. Deloitte, for example, has annual revenues of over $50 billion, which can buy the best legal defense.

The CPA profession desperately needs an overhaul of the regulatory apparatus to address high-profile cases involving large firms and nonprofits with political affiliations. The National Association of State Boards of Accountancy should expand its authority to handle these cases.

Jason Goodman, Charles Ortel, and Bob Bishop discussed the landmark case on Crowdsource the Truth on Sunday morning, September 25, 2020.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.






Send this to a friend